Domestic CBRN CM. Command Relationships: Domestic CBRN CM may engage the full spectrum of government, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector. Unity of effort can be achieved without unity of command and is the predominant solution in domestic CBRN response operations. Success requires unity of effort, which respects the chain of command of each participating organization while harnessing seamless coordination across jurisdictions in support of common objectives. Military forces always remain under the control of the chain of command as established by Title 10, USC, Title 14, USC, Title 32, USC, or state active duty. NG Soldiers and Airmen may serve either in a federal status like other reserve soldiers, or in a state status (state active duty or Title 32, USC), under the command of the governor. The state governors, through TAGs, control NG forces when those forces are performing active duty in their state role and when performing active duty under Title 32, USC. Legislation allows for a dual-status commander to have command authority over both federal and state forces. A dual-status commander provides a means for providing unity of effort for military forces operating in Title 32, USC, and Title 10, USC. A dual-status commander must be duly appointed and can be an active duty officer who accepts an additional state commission or can be a federalized state NG officer. At the operational level, the joint field office ensures unity of effort by identifying agencies that have the requisite capabilities to reach the common objectives or the ability to adapt their wide-area operations in light of the response by bringing their core competencies to the interagency forum. The JFC can facilitate unity of effort with civil authorities at the tactical level by recognizing the incident commander's need to integrate the JFC's resources into his incident action plan, while remaining cognizant that US law prevents direct tasking by any entity outside the military chain of command